On Sep 13, 2010, at 6:54 AM, Havoc Pennington wrote: > On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 12:05 AM, John Ralls <jra...@ceridwen.us> wrote: >>> Could also make it a gdk_x11 api. >>> But maybe a hint that is a no-op on other backends is better. >> >> I'm in favor of keeping platform-specific stuff in platform-specific files >> and directories, but that's in large part just because I'm a bit compulsive >> when it comes to code organization. >> > > Making it gdk_x11 doesn't keep the platform-specific in > platform-specific files. It would make all files touched by > d3802ca8331ab09fe752407577b12d1525b5d89e now include gdkx.h and an > #ifdef'd call to the gdk_x11 API. So textview, layout, treeview, > viewport would all now have x11-specific code. > > The API need not be X specific, though the details depend on how > Windows and Mac work and I don't know them.
I got a bit lost whether we are still going to add this API or not :) But for what it's worth, as far as I can see now, this API is fine from an OS X point of view. Especially with the two "conditionals" at the end of the function description there is likely enough room to do what is best suited for a given platform or to emulate the pieces that are required. -kris. _______________________________________________ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
