On Fri, 22 Oct 2010 17:20:45 0200, Ryan Lortie wrote: On Fri, 2010-10-22 at 16:14 0100, Bastien Nocera wrote: > > glib 3.0 maybe? We're still discussing changes for glib 2.x, aren't we? > > If you accept the following premises: > > - we can't break glib API without effectively also breaking Gtk API *phew*
- we aren't going to bump glib's version number when we release Gtk3
X constant for Y=3
- we like glib to have the same version as Gtk in the long-run
X=Y
then it becomes clear that we need to skip GLib 3.0.
Assertion failed: (X!=3) dan -- Daniel Macks [email protected]
_______________________________________________ gtk-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
