On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 2:18 AM, Tristan Van Berkom <trista...@openismus.com> wrote:
> In conclusion: > ============= > > Can we do either one of the following (in the order of my preference): > > a.) Give up the complaining about moving code from _init() to > ->constructor() and just accept that ->constructor() is the > right place to call highlevel apis accessing 'self'. This one was soundly rejected in the meeting. > > b.) Implement the "Claudio's original patch" approach (i.e. > as I mentioned above, this can be solved by simply creating > the GtkCellArea early for renegade subclasses which insist > on accessing the api from _init()). > I'll start wading into this mess tomorrow, we'll see what comes out. As for the less contentious topics, the GtkSettings keyfile work is now available in the settings-keyfile branch, and I'd appreciate review and comments... _______________________________________________ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
