On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 5:16 PM, Ryan Lortie <de...@desrt.ca> wrote: > > All of it except the source API changes is dependent on the libgthread > merge.
I see that now - makes sense. > This was a separate branch, actually, but I just nuked it to reduce the > noise of all the branches I've been pushing. I'll split it back out and > push it again. Great, thanks! I should also mention I looked briefly through the source stuff and it looked really nice - you have good ideas here and the patches are pretty clean. > Everything in this email and on the branch is for the start of next > cycle. Yeah, I more meant that ideally the source stuff lands after. > I actually think the opposite. I'd prefer if we could enable super-slow > debug mode with an environment variable. It would make it way easier to > get debugging information out of users who are experiencing a problem > and don't want to rebuild their system glib or their application. If the cost is small, I agree environment variables are fine. But the cost is not always small even to just have the code around (think about reference count tracking). > Another option is to use library load constructors to run the > initialisation we need to do. That's certainly possible on Windows > systems and anything using GCC. I'm not sure if it's possible to do it > in a portable way from pure C, though. This might be the way to go if we can make it cheap. _______________________________________________ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
