On Thu, 08 Sep 2011 22:07:59 +0200, Kean Johnston wrote: > No I wasn't proposing it at all, I was just saying what was POSSIBLE as a > means of combating the question posed. What i *ACTUALLY* propose is an > easily installable set of DLL's that register themselves properly and will > not let an older version overwrite a newer one, and rely on backwards > compatibility among the minor releases. Thus, I do propose the library be > named libglib-2.0.dll *as long as* the installation mechanism ensures that > an installation of 2.26.x cant overwrite an installation of 2.28.x.
I'm pretty sure every reasonable installer won't let you overwrite newer file version with an older one. -- < Jernej Simončič ><><><><>< http://eternallybored.org/ > _______________________________________________ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
