On Fri, 2013-10-04 at 12:51 +0100, Emmanuele Bassi wrote: > hi Tim; > > thanks for doing some triage on GTK bugs: it's much appreciated.
No problem. > > On 4 October 2013 08:42, Timothy Arceri <t_arc...@yahoo.com.au> wrote: > > > Quick question about GTK enhancements regarding X. With focus now shifting > > to Wayland is it safe for me to start marking really old GTK X enhancements > > as wont fix? > > > > Two quick examples (I'm sure there is plenty more): > > > > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53353 > > > > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=59724 > > woah, there! those are really retro bugs. :-) Yeah there are still a hole bunch of really retro bugs tagged as affecting GTK 1.2.x [1] and 1.3.x [2] [1] https://bugzilla.gnome.org/buglist.cgi?product=gtk% 2B&bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED&version=1.2.x [2] https://bugzilla.gnome.org/buglist.cgi?product=gtk% 2B&bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED&version=1.3.x > > I think both can safely be closed as OBSOLETE, and not (just) because > we want to switch to Wayland. > > ciao, > Emmanuele. > _______________________________________________ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
