That's an error for glibc, not glib. You'd be better off talking to the
glibc people about that one...
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 12:32 PM, Daniel Schultze <king...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
> I'm have a new error with my build. I did some searches which suggested to
> not use --enable-static-nss which I'm not doing. I did do an edit to one of
> the awk scripts, scripts/gen-sorted.awk, the build was reporting an error
> on lines containing /\/[^/]+$/ , so I added an extra backslash in the
> middle to /\/[^\/]+$/ . Hopefully this edit is unrelated.
>
> Here's the error log:
> isoc99_scanf.c: In function '__isoc99_scanf':
> isoc99_scanf.c:33: error: '_IO_acquire_lock_needs_exceptions_enabled'
> undeclared (first use in this function)
> isoc99_scanf.c:33: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
> isoc99_scanf.c:33: error: for each function it appears in.)
> isoc99_scanf.c: At top level:
> isoc99_scanf.c:40: error: expected identifier or '(' before 'while'
> isoc99_scanf.c:41: error: expected identifier or '(' before 'return'
> isoc99_scanf.c:42: error: expected identifier or '(' before '}' token
> make[2]: ***
> [/home/xxx/ltib_xx/rpm/BUILD/glibc-2.7/build-glibc/stdio-common/isoc99_scanf.o]
> Error 1
> make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
> isoc99_vscanf.c: In function '__isoc99_vscanf':
> isoc99_vscanf.c:29: error: '_IO_acquire_lock_needs_exceptions_enabled'
> undeclared (first use in this function)
> isoc99_vscanf.c:29: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only
> once
> isoc99_vscanf.c:29: error: for each function it appears in.)
> isoc99_vscanf.c: At top level:
> isoc99_vscanf.c:32: error: expected identifier or '(' before 'while'
> isoc99_vscanf.c:33: error: expected identifier or '(' before 'return'
> isoc99_vscanf.c:34: error: expected identifier or '(' before '}' token
> make[2]: ***
> [/home/xxx/ltib_xx/rpm/BUILD/glibc-2.7/build-glibc/stdio-common/isoc99_vscanf.o]
> Error 1
> isoc99_fscanf.c: In function '__isoc99_fscanf':
> isoc99_fscanf.c:31: error: '_IO_acquire_lock_needs_exceptions_enabled'
> undeclared (first use in this function)
> isoc99_fscanf.c:31: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only
> once
> isoc99_fscanf.c:31: error: for each function it appears in.)
> isoc99_fscanf.c: At top level:
> isoc99_fscanf.c:38: error: expected identifier or '(' before 'while'
> isoc99_fscanf.c:39: error: expected identifier or '(' before 'return'
> isoc99_fscanf.c:40: error: expected identifier or '(' before '}' token
> make[2]: ***
> [/home/xxx/ltib_xx/rpm/BUILD/glibc-2.7/build-glibc/stdio-common/isoc99_fscanf.o]
> Error 1
> isoc99_vfscanf.c: In function '__isoc99_vfscanf':
> isoc99_vfscanf.c:29: error: '_IO_acquire_lock_needs_exceptions_enabled'
> undeclared (first use in this function)
> isoc99_vfscanf.c:29: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only
> once
> isoc99_vfscanf.c:29: error: for each function it appears in.)
> isoc99_vfscanf.c: At top level:
> isoc99_vfscanf.c:32: error: expected identifier or '(' before 'while'
> isoc99_vfscanf.c:33: error: expected identifier or '(' before 'return'
> isoc99_vfscanf.c:34: error: expected identifier or '(' before '}' token
> make[2]: ***
> [/home/xxx/ltib_xx/rpm/BUILD/glibc-2.7/build-glibc/stdio-common/isoc99_vfscanf.o]
> Error 1
> make[2]: Leaving directory
> `/home/xxx/ltib_xx/rpm/BUILD/glibc-2.7/stdio-common'
> make[1]: *** [stdio-common/subdir_lib] Error 2
> make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/xxx/ltib_xx/rpm/BUILD/glibc-2.7'
> make: *** [all] Error 2
> error: Bad exit status from /home/xxx/ltib_xx/tmp/rpm-tmp.15860 (%build)
>
>
> -Dan
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 12:01 PM, Colin Walters <walt...@verbum.org> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 2013-11-08 at 10:28 -0800, Daniel Schultze wrote:
>>
>>
>> > The host is Ubuntu 12.04 x86_64, the target CPU is an arm926ejs on a
>> > Freescale board, using LTIB. It is an older system using glibc 2.5
>> > with glibc ports 2.5.
>>
>> From a quick look, this commit to glibc looks like it updated the splice
>> prototype:
>>
>> commit 99ea5991a4957f7a21466a4b48c5020eb70db2b7
>> Author: Ulrich Drepper <drep...@redhat.com>
>> AuthorDate: Wed Aug 30 15:05:29 2006 +0000
>>
>> * sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/alpha/bits/fcntl.h (splice): Add offin
>>
>> Which as you can see is really quite ancient.
>>
>> > --- glib-2.28.7.orig/configure 2011-05-20 21:15:25.000000000 -0700
>> > +++ glib-2.28.7/configure 2013-11-08 10:15:51.380683520 -0800
>> > @@ -23107,7 +23107,6 @@
>> > ac_fn_c_check_func "$LINENO" "splice" "ac_cv_func_splice"
>> > if test "x$ac_cv_func_splice" = xyes; then :
>> > cat >>confdefs.h <<_ACEOF
>> > -#define HAVE_SPLICE 1
>> > _ACEOF
>>
>> That's probably fine as a fix for you for now, this issue will go away
>> when you update to a version of glibc from this decade too =)
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> gtk-devel-list mailing list
> gtk-devel-list@gnome.org
> https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
>
>
--
Jasper
_______________________________________________
gtk-devel-list mailing list
gtk-devel-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
