On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 10:16 AM, Alberto Ruiz <ar...@gnome.org> wrote:
> However, building Gtk+ is not trivial and I am sure waf is going to require > some fixing before it can support a full build, if people want to take on > the task of setting up a branch and checking what it would look like, I > would be happy to help upstreaming any extensions needed (I have commit > rights in the waf repository). On the other hand I wouldn't keep my hopes > too high that the Gtk+ maintainers are going to happily move over unless > someone shows what major improvements the port would bring. To repeat what Emmanuele already said: I have zero interest in switching GTK+ build systems. autoconf works pretty well for us. Applications can of course use any build system their maintainer prefers, but I don't see why GTK+ should be providing a build system for you... we have our hands full providing you a toolkit. _______________________________________________ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
