On Sun, 2015-01-11 at 16:43 +0000, Emmanuele Bassi wrote: > hi; > > thanks for your patches. GTK+ does not use the mailing list to track > bugs and patches; could you please open bugs on Bugzilla, instead? > > just use: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=gtk%2B > > this will make it easier for us to track the issue, review the code, > and commit the change.
This looks similar to (but not the same as) the patches I posted from analysing GTK+ with Clang static analyser in November, which are still awaiting review. I really hope we aren't going to end up with duplicate bug reports and duplicate patches because things are not getting reviewed. :'-( https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=712760 Philip > thanks again! > > ciao, > Emmanuele. > > > On 11 January 2015 at 15:06, Maks Naumov <maksq...@ukr.net> wrote: > > gtkcellrenderer.c 1096 > > > > g_return_if_fail (xpad >= 0 && xpad >= 0); > > _______________________________________________ > > gtk-devel-list mailing list > > gtk-devel-list@gnome.org > > https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list > > > > >
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
