On Fri, 2015-01-23 at 18:52 -0800, Cosimo Cecchi wrote: > On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 10:24 AM, Carlos Garcia Campos > <carlo...@gnome.org> wrote: > One important thing is that preview providers should be out of > process, > > since unfortunately it's very easy to make things crash with > buggy files > (which are very common). That could be done by every provider, > but if we > force that at a higher level it would be much better. That > would also > ensure that preview providers don't block the UI main thread, > assuming > the communication with the provider processes will be always > asynchronous unconditionally. > > > I ultimately agree, and I wrote a paragraph to that effect in my > proposal... > It's tricky to enforce this in the library, because it effectively > means inventing a way for a process to draw into another process that > doesn't look like libbonobo, and I didn't really want to go that > path...
sub-surfaces? _______________________________________________ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
