well one of the reasons is that we are patching downstream in this ways (it
can be fixed though)
https://github.com/Alexpux/MINGW-packages/blob/master/mingw-w64-glib2/0027-no_sys_if_nametoindex.patch

and afaik fan or lrn had some ideas to improve some parts of the code once
xp is dropped

On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 9:41 AM, Alexander Larsson <al...@redhat.com> wrote:

> On tis, 2015-03-31 at 22:41 +0200, Ignacio Casal Quinteiro wrote:
> > Hey folks,
> >
> >
> > so I was wondering if for 3.18/2.46 if we should drop XP. I think it
> > would make our life easier and anyway why do we need to support
> > something that microsoft is also not supporting?
>
> My opinion on this is that we should do this as soon as it is any kind
> of inconvenience to us to support XP. I.E. if we add some non-optional
> feature that doesn't work on XP. I don't think we necessarily have to
> drop existing XP code "just because", let the existing support stay
> there until it no longer works.
>
> Its possible that this is true already, I've not done any Win32 work
> recently. If so, just drop it.
>
> --
> =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
>  Alexander Larsson                                            Red Hat, Inc
>        al...@redhat.com            alexander.lars...@gmail.com
> He's an otherworldly neurotic cyborg living undercover at Ringling Bros.
> Circus. She's an enchanted green-skinned barmaid with an incredible
> destiny. They fight crime!
>
>


-- 
Ignacio Casal Quinteiro
_______________________________________________
gtk-devel-list mailing list
gtk-devel-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list

Reply via email to