Le samedi 17 octobre 2015 à 01:20 +0800, cee1 a écrit : > 2015-10-16 23:46 GMT+08:00 Florian Müllner <fmuell...@gnome.org>: > > On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 5:38 PM, cee1 <fykc...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> If yes, we may let GObject inherit from > >> GstMiniObject to obtain the COW feature? > > > > This would break ABI, so not something you should expect any time > soon. > > So what about GObject2(a bit likes playbin2 in GStreamer)? Code can > change to inherit from it and recompiling...
That's an extremely ugly fallback solution, specially for a feature that no one will use. The problem here is that GObject cannot be copied generically, when they are, it's a custom feature. Note that reference based locking isn't always great. If I was to redo that, I'm opt for explicit locking instead. In GStreamer we have hit many of the limitation of this model. This can of course be introduced with an GInterface if you drop this cr azy idea of using ref-count to figure-out writability. Nicolas
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
