Just wondering what the position on this is. I've seen a few conflicting
indications:

(1) The new meson patches pass -fno-strict-aliasing to GCC and Clang:
https://git.gnome.org/browse/gtk+/commit/?h=wip/meson&id=1e3daf3178bb3db56ab12a55195969857f685101
The rationale is "We don't want to build buggy code." Well, technically,
code that relies on aliasing is
inherently buggy from the outset, because that violates the standard. Assuming
that's not something you strive for, the next bit is worse: I can't see an
equivalent directive for MSVC. Surely this means, without forcing the
compiler to make aliasing well-defined, code that relies on aliasing is
free to start wildly bugging out on MSVC at any time?

(2) The Autotools build files do not seem to pass this flag, indicating
that avoidance of strict aliasing was not a requirement.

(3) There's this old bug (and possibly others) to remove aliasing
violations: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=140722

So, which is true? Do we want to forbid breaking strict aliasing rules, or
do we want to require compilers that allow us to override the Standard and
rely on aliasing violations?
_______________________________________________
gtk-devel-list mailing list
gtk-devel-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list

Reply via email to