On Wed, 11 Apr 2018 at 14:02:57 -0600, Daniel Drake wrote: > I was wrong in thinking that gspawn lets you say "run this binary, and > here's the fd that you should use for stdout".
The interface for that is the newer GSubprocess and GSubprocessLauncher. > So, in order to avoid needing gnome-shell's app_child_setup(), we > would either need to extend the gspawn API to allow specific file > descriptors to be passed in, or perhaps another option to consider is > to have gdesktopappinfo call posix_spawn directly (instead of gspawn). ... or make GDesktopAppInfo use GSubprocess instead of g_spawn, and have a way for GSubprocess to use posix_spawn instead of g_spawn in the (hopefully common) case where its ChildData.child_setup_func is NULL. smcv _______________________________________________ gtk-devel-list mailing list email@example.com https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list