On Wed, 2005-07-06 at 09:05 +0200, Stefan Kost wrote: > Owen Taylor wrote: > > On Sun, 2005-07-03 at 23:12 +0100, Damon Chaplin wrote: > > > >>On Wed, 2005-05-25 at 09:37 +0200, Stefan Kost wrote: > >> > >>>hi damon, > >>> > >>>what do you think about making a new gtk-doc release? On guadec I do a BOF > >>>about > >>>gstreamer api doc and among I suggest to move docs to the sources. when > >>>doing > >>>this cleanup, it would be nice to move the long-description too. > >> > >>I just did a new release, 1.4 (since I think the latest GTK+ depends on > >>a new gtk-doc). > >> > >>I forgot to update NEWS though. Oops. > > > > > > Don't put --only-section-tmpl into NEWS if you do update it ... it > > doesn't work :-( > > > ??? I don't get it (joking?)
I mean:
2005-05-10 Owen Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* gtkdoc-mktmpl.in (OutputTemplateFile): Add an
--only-section-tmpl flag so that projects that keep everything
but section descriptions inline can avoid cvs conflicts.
Doesn't work, so shouldn't be mentioned as a new feature in 1.4... what
I tested was that the template files contained the right stuff ...
section headers but no symbol docs.
What I didn't test was that the generated doc-book was correct...
it wasn't: gtkdoc-mkdb uses various structures generated when reading
the the section templates to build the docs.
It's very much fixable, but wasn't trivial ... I spent 30 minutes or
so on it and then gave up. (The immediate task at hand then was to
fix the Cairo docs, which I ended up doing by removing
--only-section-tmpl.)
Regards,
Owen
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ gtk-doc-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-doc-list
