Hi Stefan, > If you don't put e.g. LsmMathmlRadicalElementClass, gtk-doc naturally expects > you to document it :)
Thanks a lot for your answer. I've fixed lasem and get rid of all the warnings. I think the warning message doesn't explain clearly what's wrong, and doesn't help to fix them. And I don't get the point of such warnings. The content of foo-undocumented.txt should be enough, no ? Also, the sections file was mostly autogenerated. It would be better if at least the FooClass structures are automatically placed in the Standard subsection. Thanks again, Emmanuel. _______________________________________________ gtk-doc-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-doc-list
