On 02/05/2018 04:34 PM, Aleksandr Slobodeniuk wrote: > Hi again! > > I've tried to submit a bugs to bugzilla, but couldn't find gtk-doc > project there (strange, yes, I submitted bugs on Gnome Bugzilla before).
Here you go: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=gtk-doc > > So, I'll send it here, if you know how to create a ticket - I'll do it. > ----- > Version 1.27 > > Bug 1. > If we have a structure, with union inside of it (as one of fields) - > documentation for this field doesn't appear in HTML. > > you can easily check it by cloning this project: > https://github.com/aslobodeniuk/gtkdoc-test > > (master branch) > > Just run ./script, and it will cleanup, compile and generate html Please report this. If you can provide this as a patch for the test suite (bugs), that'd be awesome. I'll have to run with GTKDOC_TRACE=debug and see where the parse fails. > > > ----- > Bug 2. (you can check it by switching the project to branch > "struct_issue". > > if we define typedef structure without enter before the "{", like this > > "typedef struct _s { ... " - it appears in documentation normally. > > If with enter before the "{", like this > " > typedef struct _s > { > ... > " > > - the whole struct doesn't appear in documentation. The parser in gtk-doc is already complicated enough. If there is an easy fix I won't mind though. > > > ------------ > So... thanks for your attention. Thanks for the reports Stefan > > > _______________________________________________ > gtk-doc-list mailing list > gtk-doc-list@gnome.org > https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-doc-list
_______________________________________________ gtk-doc-list mailing list gtk-doc-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-doc-list
