Hey' On Wed, 27 Aug 2003 21:52:16 +0200 Jeroen Asselman wrote:
> All the others are even more confusing probably (gal, gnet). I would > say, stick to gnut for now. The gnut project doesn't seem to be alive. > So a library which references to gnut probably won't be to confusing. I wrote to Ian Zepp, the author of the defunct gnutellalib python module and he responded: > I have no plans to revive the lib. It has been years since I have > worked with it. Feel free to use the name. > > Thanks, > > Ian So my vote for gnutellalib for the library and gnut would still work for the prefix. -- Murphy ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Gtk-gnutella-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gtk-gnutella-devel
