Hi, 'good' news. I have been able to reproduce the bug with those extra assertions. I am now checking when this exactly happens to find the cleanest solution.
Op vr 03-10-2003, om 12:52 schreef [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > > Ah -- I suspect that 99.99% of all users are using gcc for their > > compiler. In that case, I now understand why I'm having problems, > > and they are not. My compiler can't even be told to all this with > > any switches - accesses to address zero are forbidden by the OS, > > so it wouldn't do any good to give the compiler a switch to allow > > it. > > > > Once you add the assertion code to test for u->name == null, I think > > you will see it happening on your test machine too. > > Well as I said in another mail yesterday evening. I added those assertions > in parq.c but they didn't trigger a problem for me. I haven't heard it > triggered the problem for anyone else. So the problem must be lying > somewhere else. > > Perhaps you can join the gtk-gnutella irc channel at freenode. I am around > there in the evening most of the time. Europe time zone. > > I also would still like to see the changes you made. Perhaps you are > missing something obvious? -- Jeroen Asselman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Dit berichtdeel is digitaal ondertekend
