Quoting Emile le Vivre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> from ml.softs.gtk-gnutella.devel: :So the patch as submitted yesterday should make the passive search :sorting behave correctly as far as I can tell (please let me know if :it's otherwise). I can quite easily create a patch that removes the :count record value altogether and uses a gui lookup for column sorting :for all sort by # cases. Functionally it'll be worse but it'll be :neater in code. Let me know.
I would prefer a patch that would use a '#' stored somewhere else than in the record, with clear commenting about why it is done that way. Can you explain why performance is lower when '#' is stored in the GUI instead of in the record? Does the problem exist in GTK1 only, or does it apply for GTK2 (I would assume the latter). I don't really mind if it's slower because the current behaviour is not correct. You can make any program fast when you sacrifice correctness! Raphael ------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn _______________________________________________ Gtk-gnutella-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gtk-gnutella-devel
