You are right, the logo can only be designed after the name is found. But the name will stay gtk-gnutella for quite a while, and perhaps it would also be fine to have a good logo matching that temporary name.
Once it is time for 1.0, we can still find a _really_ good name and design a _really_ good logo (I already have a serious idea for that). But until then, having a better logo for the current gtk-gnutella cannot hurt, I think. Greetz, Hauke Hachmann Am Samstag, 14. Februar 2004 02:10 schrob Chagas Chagas: > Mrs, > > The text below twisted my brain. How to draw a logomark without the mark > itself? > > Whatever Gnutella ? > Something Gnutella ? > GTKGing (GTK-Gnutella is not for GTK) ? > > My sugestion is to vote for a new name first, then the logo, banner, > splash, etc. > > Just a question: is it mandatory to maintain the current logo? (I like it, > but this detail is important to people who will try new designs). > > Greetings, > > Enio Chagas > > |The name "gtk-gnutella" will probably change at some point. We currently > |only support Gtk1 and Gtk2 frontends, so the name fits. But we want to > |add e.g. a web frontend and we think about renaming gtk-gnutella to > |something else then. This will probably not happen for at least a year, > |but it may be something you should keep at the back of your mind. The > |notion the banner/splash screen should convey is that of the "gnutella" > |network and probably of file sharing, as that is what gtk-gnutella can > |do. ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now. Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id56&alloc_id438&op=click _______________________________________________ Gtk-gnutella-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gtk-gnutella-devel
