> Oops, sorry. I've got this weird idea by quickly glancing over the patch > but this is obviously not the case. You didn't do what I claimed above. > > Jeroen: I've you get the assertion again, you should get the values > for ps and prop and check what property that is. Maybe it would be > possible somehow to print this before the assertion kicks in.
I think that it's possibly a missing dependency in the source files. Since I inserted the property (instead of appending it), the property_t values where increased by 1 after the insertion point. But probably not all files using these properties where recompiled by the makefile, so the assertion fails, because some object files use the new property_t values and some use the old ones. Greetings, Thomas. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the new InstallShield X. >From Windows to Linux, servers to mobile, InstallShield X is the one installation-authoring solution that does it all. Learn more and evaluate today! http://www.installshield.com/Dev2Dev/0504 _______________________________________________ Gtk-gnutella-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gtk-gnutella-devel
