Haxe wrote: > Rethinking the queuing issue, I must say that I'm still not convinced. > > If testing if the file exists on each queue re-try, and sending a 404 > > if appropriate breaks the current specs, then that's a no-no. > In the following, I want to give arguments for three points: > 1. Sending a 404 doesn't violate the PARQ specs
If we're actually talking about the case in which a client is queued but the file appears to be absent when the transfer is supposed to start, I'd suggest to use "410 Gone" instead. This would help to differ between bugs which cause corrupted/wrong requests and the current case we're talking about. -- Christian
pgpVIAcQpfkK5.pgp
Description: PGP signature
