Christian Biere said: > alex wrote: >> * Should the MAX_ENTRIES be ignored for files that we are actively >> downloading? > >> * Is the oldest timestamp a suitable test for goodness of the dmesh >> entry? Could we be throwing away "good" entries for potentially more >> upto date entries that still may not be currently available? > > Unless someone answered you in private, I'm afraid you have to verify > that yourself and might provide a (very welcome) patch if necessary as > the others are easy busy with other things or have no time for GTKG at > the moment at all.
No probs, I'll add it to the list of things to investigate after I've fixed the GTK1 bitzi feedback and cached the bitzi results. I've already got a few debugging g_message's in my local build to investigate its behaviour. > If you (or anyone else) doesn't get an answer to his > mail, don't misunderstand that as "we don't care". 99% of the time it > means, "we don't know either". :-) Don't worry I understand the development process. I just wanted to make sure I wasn't talking b**locks again! I've tinkered with the dmesh code before so I think I can get upto speed on whats going inside. -- Alex http://www.bennee.com/~alex/ ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Sybase ASE Linux Express Edition - download now for FREE LinuxWorld Reader's Choice Award Winner for best database on Linux. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5588&alloc_id=12065&op=click _______________________________________________ Gtk-gnutella-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gtk-gnutella-devel
