Haxe wrote: > On Wednesday 23 February 2005 04:24, Christian Biere wrote: > > Luckily, it was still running. Yes, first I didn't get any qhits from > > it. However, searching for "mp3" gained results from it. > Please note that I was talking about the QHits that my client sends out, > i.e. the TX side, not about how many QHits I receive. As you can see on > the screenshot, I haven't issued a search that could have lead to > receiving QHits.
Ah, sorry I see my mistake now. > 1. > Why is it an ultrapeer when it's not well connected? With "well connected" I meant "connected to a sufficiently large network of peers that share a sufficient amount of files". Maybe it's connected to many "leechers" or broken/buggy clients. It's still running and I've verified that it's connected to a good amount of peers - it could be lying of course. > > OTOH, there could be a problem with the query routing > > tables, of course, > Yes, it could be possible that this UP delivers queries to my host only > with keywords that I do NOT have, so that none of the queries matches > my share. Could you connect to the host and tell me the names and SHA1s of some files you share - start a secondary instance with files extracted from /dev/zero or /dev/urandom if you like - to check whether that's really the case? If you're connected to it, try to search for these: urn:sha1:B4OZVROOMN4FBJCOTFQ3UU73UYXQQSN7 ghostwhitecrab-0.9.2.tar.bz2 urn:sha1:BLABLABLABLABLABLABLABLABLABLABL bigfile.bz2 -- Christian
pgpPtoJqxOdO9.pgp
Description: PGP signature
