Alex Bennee wrote: > On Wed, 2005-04-06 at 00:10 +0200, Christian Biere wrote: > > Oh well, the check in base32_sha1() was actually wrong.
> Ah-ha! Everything is working now. I wonder why PARQ didn't bomb out? Well, it warned about a damaged SHA1 tag each time and I've just noticed a real bad typo regarding the NAME tag. Both caused by me - but I think it was worth it, to a certain extent. -- Christian
pgp77AV2w67If.pgp
Description: PGP signature
