Lars Nordlund wrote: > ./lib/prop.h:51: error: redeclaration of enumerator 'PROP_TYPE_STRING' > /usr/include/prop/prop_object.h:60: error: previous definition of > 'PROP_TYPE_STRING' was here > ./lib/prop.h:55: error: conflicting types for 'prop_type_t' > /usr/include/prop/prop_object.h:65: error: previous declaration of > 'prop_type_t' was here
> NetBSD 4.0 intend to introduce a proplib with corresponding header > files in /usr/include/prop. This clashes with prop.h in gtk-gnutella. > The name 'prop' seems to be popular these days. > I have not yet investigated if /usr/include/prop/prop_object.h is > supposed to be used here, or not. I tried to follow the include chain > to find out how the files are connected, but failed. For all I know > right now, it could be a temporary hickup in NetBSD-current. Please, send-pr. This stuff has no place in userland. In general namespace pollution has to stop. An operating system can use os_*, posix_*, libc_* or sys_* or whatever people consider reasonable but *not* arbitrary names. -- Christian ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Gtk-gnutella-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gtk-gnutella-devel
