> Bill Pringlemeir wrote: >> It looks like maybe the "n->degree < 2 * NODE_LEGACY_DEGREE" should >> be removed with the comment, unless you are familiar with code >> and/or history.
On 4 Jan 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I don't see why you want to remove this unless you want to connect > to such a legacy Ultrapeer without high outdegree support. Sorry, I meant that is what the comment made me think. After looking at older code, I knew that "n->degree < 2 * NODE_LEGACY_DEGREE" should still exist. It seemed rather low (16 nodes) to be called "high outdegree", so it seemed that *maybe* this was what the comment was referring too. I was looking for what the comment referred to and this seemed the most likely thing, but it was still puzzling... "It looks like maybe" isn't highly specific English; sorry about that. I don't want to remove this, and I don't want anyone else to remove it ;-). Thanks, Bill Pringlemeir. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Gtk-gnutella-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gtk-gnutella-devel
