Matthew Lye wrote: > I've noticed that two of the BearShare versions, especially, "Lite > 5.2.5.1" and the now apparently ubiquitous "5.2.5.6 (Polska)", seem to > be have much faster connection times than any other clients, including > other BearShare versions. I'm not sure if that's due to the software, > or if they're being run on servers.
The additional TLS handshake has some overhead of course. > But I think that they're > regularly beating out the other clients in the connection pool, and > that this results in a much higher percentage of connections. I've > taken to hand-pruning them, to try to escape what appears to be a > localized node cluster / closed network phenomena; if I do nothing, I > just get the same old query hits, over and over again. > Has anyone confirmed that they are *not* filtering their reportage of > suggested ultra-peers to try? I don't understand this sentence. > I keep meaning to check this with > netcat (nc), but have lost the page that told me how to hand-code the > handshake. I've been distracted from my GTKG meddling by other > projects, recently. -- 1000 octets = 1 ko = 1 kilooctet; 1024 octets = 1 Kio = 1 kibioctet 1000^2 octets = 1 Mo = 1 megaoctet; 1024^2 octets = 1 Mio = 1 mebioctet 1000^3 octets = 1 Go = 1 gigaoctet; 1024^3 octets = 1 Gio = 1 gibioctet ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ gtk-gnutella-devel mailing list gtk-gnutella-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gtk-gnutella-devel
