Matthew Lye wrote:
> Hey,
> 
> Putting the GUID debacle behind us.  Ahem.
> 
> I've been noticing this lately, so I ran build.sh for a 'clean' (un- 
> fiddled with) version of GTKG, and got the same error.  Basically, the  
> __powerpc__ token isn't defined on my machine.

You can peek at such definitions like this:
echo | gcc -E -g3 -

I guess your system defined __ppc__ and it should be semantically
equivalent to __powerpc__, except for endianness maybe but that
doesn't matter here.

> I don't know when or  
> how in the compile this is supposed to happen, nor how to track it  
> down, but I suspect that (a) gcc-darwin uses a different token for the  
> processor or (b) this breaks compiles which are optimized for a  
> particular PPC chip.  [This last point just occurred to me.]
> 
> For myself, I just threw in
> > #define __powerppc__
> right before the IEEE 754 check, and everything worked fine.

That's not recommendable.

-- 
Christian

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
gtk-gnutella-devel mailing list
gtk-gnutella-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gtk-gnutella-devel

Reply via email to