On Wed, 2010-12-15 at 11:50 -0800, Bill Spitzak wrote: > > Owen Taylor wrote: > > On Wed, 2010-12-15 at 10:33 -0800, Travis Griggs wrote: > >> Is there any hope of Pango every becoming dual licensed? > > > > Basically, no. It would be a pretty huge relicensing job to contact all > > the contributors over the years, but even speaking just for the code > > written by Red Hat, I don't think we'd be open to relicensing. > > Is the HarfBuzz license usable? I'm guessing it is because Qt is using it.
Just to be clear, Pango's license is usable! - Owen _______________________________________________ gtk-i18n-list mailing list gtk-i18n-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-i18n-list