Re: Massive speed improvement in GObject type checking code

[Sander Vesik]

On Tue, 19 Jun 2001, Tim Janik wrote:

> On 19 Jun 2001, Owen Taylor wrote:
> 
> huh? that'd be new to me, "extern inline" is, but "static inline" should
> be handled by any compiler that's capable of handling inline functions.
> 

One would hope. It's unfortunately not the case though.

On the other side of the coin:
        * compilers are allowed to totally inline any static function
        * it doesn't really make any sense to use anything but static
          scope for inline functions (making 'static inline' redundant)
        * I fail to see what an 'extern inline' would be, esp. in a world
          where the only toolchain doing link time optimisations died out
          long ago

> > 
> >                                         Owen
> > 
> 
> ---
> ciaoTJ
> 

        Sander

One day a tortoise will learn to fly
        -- Terry Pratchett, 'Small Gods'


_______________________________________________
gtk-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list