>parent heaps totally independent, as should be. Maybe there is a way to >tell gtk at the fork point whether child or parent will keep the widgets >instead of leaving it up to gtk to decide?
there isn't any choice. the child cannot access the widgets. end of story. i didn't even both to check your code to notice that it was doing that. if you want to operate on widgets created in a given process, you need to be inside that process. once you fork, you can't access them anymore (well, not without expecting problems). what makes you think you could do this? >subroutine is performed within a simple loop. I have also noticed that >with gtk either the parent or the child can take over the gtk widgets, >depending on who accesses them first. So I believe some error (probably what code are you looking at that makes you think it works this way? --p _______________________________________________ gtk-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list
