On Wed, 2002-06-26 at 14:09, Olivier Fourdan wrote: > Could this be related to double buffering in GTK+-2.0 ? > > The fact that the CPU is taken on the X server machine might be because > the X server has to manage the buffering. But I noticed, that scrolling CList with GTK 2.0 eats 2 times more CPU for X, and about 10 times more CPU for application than with GTK 1.2. As I can understand the 2 times increase for X, the 10 times factor for application is very strange for me.
Regards, Olaf _______________________________________________ gtk-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list
