On Sat, 15 May 2004 15:03:41 +0200, "David Necas (Yeti)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  said:

> There should be no unexpanded @X_CFLAGS@ in the command.
> However I don't how it could get there.  What configure says
> about X (and grep ^X_ config.log)?

A borked pkg-config specification returning bogus --cflags?

Another possibility is that a previous ./configure run was aborted and
left a corrupted config.cache around...

I guess we'll never know for sure, as a 'make clean' apparently fixed
the problem for the original poster...

Attachment: pgpTpuBx45XR9.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
gtk-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list

Reply via email to