On Tue, 2008-05-27 at 21:40 -0400, Michael P. Soulier wrote: > Daniel Kasak wrote: > > I always use the binaries produced by Alexander Shaduri at: > > http://gtk-win.sourceforge.net/home/index.php/Downloads > > I ended up using these. > > http://gladewin32.sourceforge.net/
I've used them at various times. They're not updated very often. Also without the theme packages & installer from Alexander, the resulting applications look quite bad ... ie not something that I'd present to a client and be able to hold my head high ... > I find the Gtk+ packaging situation for Win32 ridiculous. Next time I'll > probably just use Java, God help me. At least I can get it to the target > system with a minimum of hassle. Java less hassle? I doubt it. Keep in mind that you and I are amongst a very small group of trailblazers using gtk+ on Windows. That's why it's less than ideal at present. If you put some time into it ( ie scripting the installation, or at least letting various developers know what's not working ), things will improve. There are some very dedicated developers working on the Windows port. -- Daniel Kasak IT Developer NUS Consulting Group Level 5, 77 Pacific Highway North Sydney, NSW, Australia 2060 T: (+61) 2 9922-7676 / F: (+61) 2 9922 7989 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] website: http://www.nusconsulting.com.au _______________________________________________ gtk-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list
