I don't have an old background with Gtk but Sergei has resume exactly the sense of my question. Why not wait for the stable version of GLib to produce the stable Gtk lib (especially if the next stable version of the Glib is coming soon) ?
--- On Wed, 3/24/10, Tor Lillqvist <[email protected]> wrote: > From: Tor Lillqvist <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: GTK+ 2.20.0 is now available for download... > To: "IMS" <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected] > Date: Wednesday, March 24, 2010, 3:04 AM > > Is it usual to release a stable > version (here Gtk 2.20.0) based on > > development librairies like Glib ??? > > If you don't like it, feel free to wait then for GLib > 2.24. > > --tml > _______________________________________________ > gtk-list mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list<http://192.168.49.5/exchweb/bin/redir.asp?URL=http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list> > Nonsense. In the 'gnome' world _stable_are the ones which have even minor version and as _stable_ they should depend on _stable_ libraries which also have even minor version. A stable release depending on unstable libraries by definition is not stable. Regards, Sergei.
_______________________________________________ gtk-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list
