Hi Tarnyko, I think you guys are doing a great job. Thanks.
Comparing this installation to the 2.24 available on gtk.org I just miss the .lib files compatible with Visual C++. I think they are simple to be built using the DLLs and the DEFs. BTW to use your distribution with Visual C++ I had to define "inline=" to avoid a compilation error, at least in Visual C++ 9 (Visual Studio 2008). Best Regards, Antonio Scuri > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On > Behalf Of [email protected] > Sent: sexta-feira, 23 de novembro de 2012 07:24 > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: GTK+ 3.6.1 for Win32 (Runtime & Bundle) > > Hi Andy, > > I have no relation with the GTK+ team. > > Regarding the packages, I think the problem is just, they don't have any > official maintainer now. I once tried to "push" them to gtk.org, but the > mail addresses listed here (https://live.gnome.org/GtkTasks) do not exist > anymore, and nobody did answer me on IRC (#gtk+). > > As far as I know, we are 2 persons knowing how to compile GTK3 win32 > binaries. I am more specialized in producing installers. > > Regards. > > Andy Spencer writes: > > > On 2012-11-23 02:22, [email protected] wrote: > >> New installers are available for GTK+ 3.6.1 on MS-Windows. > > > > Thanks, I curious though, what's the relation between this and the > > "official" packages on gtk.org? I've noticed that they've been on 2.24 > > and 2.22 for quite some time. Do you know if there's anything preventing > > an official version of Gtk 3.x for Windows? > _______________________________________________ > gtk-list mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list _______________________________________________ gtk-list mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list
