Hi Dan, I don't need real time graphing or something like that. It should work only after triggers from user.
I don't remember exactly which feature was missed. I'll recheck. Your inputs are optimistic :-) Thanks a lot for the help. Igor On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 2:04 PM, Daniel Kasak <d.j.kasak...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 5:31 PM, Igor D <ivb...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > Thanks for prompt reply. > > > > Yes, I have couple of specific concerns: > > 1. Performance. I'm not looking for something special but expect > something > > reasonable. My few experiments show > > that performance may be too low. > > I haven't seen bad performance in terms of user experience, though I > have noticed high CPU usage in the broadwayd process(es). My very > rough guess is that you can support somewhere between 2-3 times the > number of active users as CPU cores on your system before users start > to notice. I've never done any stress-testing to see what exactly > would happened if you pushed this limit. I guess if you're trying to > deliver to more users than this model supports, you're entering "real" > web-app development. Out of interest, what kind of applications are > you considering distributing? > > It will depend a lot on what your app is doing I guess. Real-time > graphing or apps where there is constant rendering happening ( eg text > flying past in a log viewer ) will consume a lot more CPU than an app > that sits still and waits for a user to do something. > > I've also noticed that broadway gives a much better experience than > VNC. VNC is laggy and has rendering glitches. Broadway is pretty > impressive under conditions where VNC degrades badly. > > > 2. Reduced feature set, comparing to GTK without broadway. I found few > minor > > differences but this makes me afraid that it might be more. > > I haven't noticed any reduced features at all. You may have to set > some environment variables to activate things like gtk+ themes and > icon packs, but I haven't found anything with broadway that doesn't > work as I expect from a regular X11 experience. What differences have > you seen? If it's just things like icon packs, it might be worth > documenting what's needed to get on-par with X11. > > Dan > > > > > Thanks, > > Igor > > > > On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 1:21 AM, Daniel Kasak <d.j.kasak...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > >> > >> I've been using it on+off for a couple of years. As far as widget > >> toolkit functionality goes, it's a stable platform for me. Security is > >> not handled by broadway, except for basic password authentication ( 1 > >> password per linux user who runs broadway apps ). I posted on this > >> topic a little while back: > >> > >> http://tesla.duckdns.org/transparent-proxy-for- > broadway-gtk3-html5-backend/ > >> > >> Are you after some info in particular? > >> > >> Dan > >> > >> On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 5:49 AM, Igor D <ivb...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > Hi, > >> > > >> > I wonder if someone have practical experience with GTK+ with Broadway. > >> > I'll be glad to have feedback. > >> > > >> > Thanks > >> > Igor > >> > > >> > _______________________________________________ > >> > gtk-list mailing list > >> > gtk-list@gnome.org > >> > https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list > >> > > > > > >
_______________________________________________ gtk-list mailing list gtk-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list
