I don't need real time graphing or something like that. It should work only
after triggers from user.
I don't remember exactly which feature was missed. I'll recheck.
Your inputs are optimistic :-)
Thanks a lot for the help.
On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 2:04 PM, Daniel Kasak <d.j.kasak...@gmail.com>
> On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 5:31 PM, Igor D <ivb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> > Thanks for prompt reply.
> > Yes, I have couple of specific concerns:
> > 1. Performance. I'm not looking for something special but expect
> > reasonable. My few experiments show
> > that performance may be too low.
> have noticed high CPU usage in the broadwayd process(es). My very
> rough guess is that you can support somewhere between 2-3 times the
> number of active users as CPU cores on your system before users start
> to notice. I've never done any stress-testing to see what exactly
> would happened if you pushed this limit. I guess if you're trying to
> deliver to more users than this model supports, you're entering "real"
> web-app development. Out of interest, what kind of applications are
> you considering distributing?
> It will depend a lot on what your app is doing I guess. Real-time
> graphing or apps where there is constant rendering happening ( eg text
> flying past in a log viewer ) will consume a lot more CPU than an app
> that sits still and waits for a user to do something.
> I've also noticed that broadway gives a much better experience than
> VNC. VNC is laggy and has rendering glitches. Broadway is pretty
> impressive under conditions where VNC degrades badly.
> > 2. Reduced feature set, comparing to GTK without broadway. I found few
> > differences but this makes me afraid that it might be more.
> I haven't noticed any reduced features at all. You may have to set
> some environment variables to activate things like gtk+ themes and
> icon packs, but I haven't found anything with broadway that doesn't
> work as I expect from a regular X11 experience. What differences have
> you seen? If it's just things like icon packs, it might be worth
> documenting what's needed to get on-par with X11.
> > Thanks,
> > Igor
> > On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 1:21 AM, Daniel Kasak <d.j.kasak...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >> I've been using it on+off for a couple of years. As far as widget
> >> toolkit functionality goes, it's a stable platform for me. Security is
> >> not handled by broadway, except for basic password authentication ( 1
> >> password per linux user who runs broadway apps ). I posted on this
> >> topic a little while back:
> >> http://tesla.duckdns.org/transparent-proxy-for-
> >> Are you after some info in particular?
> >> Dan
> >> On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 5:49 AM, Igor D <ivb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > Hi,
> >> >
> >> > I wonder if someone have practical experience with GTK+ with Broadway.
> >> > I'll be glad to have feedback.
> >> >
> >> > Thanks
> >> > Igor
> >> >
> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > gtk-list mailing list
> >> > email@example.com
> >> > https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list
> >> >
gtk-list mailing list