Consider it "Y2K compliant with minor inconveniences". It works for M$ :-)
(Although there are none, of course)
Arjan
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Steven Hébert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, November 08, 1999 4:59 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [gtk-list] Re: (off topic answer, but funny) A
> "dumb" questio n
> ne eds an answer.. Y2K??
>
>
> Ya, that elevator may not stop and go through the roof.
> That safety system(not controled by a computer) may stop working.
>
> I bet his boss won't be waering a watch, affraid that it might blowout
> at 00:00 01/01/2000.
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Ostroff, Jack H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Monday, November 08, 1999 10:54 AM
> > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> > Subject: [gtk-list] RE: (off topic answer, but funny) A
> > "dumb" question
> > ne eds an answer.. Y2K??
> >
> >
> > What about the computers which control the elevators in the
> building?
> >
> > > From: Steven Hébert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > >
> > > Maybe you should ask your employers their cars are Y2K compliant.
> > > That should really freak 'em out. =]
> > >
> > > > From: Marc [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for the reply Erik...
> > > >
> > > > Unfortunately, my employer DOES believe in the Y2K FUD.
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe: mail -s unsubscribe
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null
> >
> >
>
> --
> To unsubscribe: mail -s unsubscribe
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null
>
--
To unsubscribe: mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null
