> The point about a sub-menu disappearing unless you follow an
> exact path with your mouse needs to be addressed. I don't think
> this is a matter of taste. I would assume any user would naturally
> feel that they could move the mouse pointer directly to a sub-menu
> item.
>
I was more thinking about the border around default buttons and the shape of the
mouse pointer...
The point you're recalling should be addressed (makes another theme entry:
menu-destroy-timeout, or something :-)...
Arjan
>
> "Arjan J. Molenaar" wrote:
>
> > If there are some things that should be worked on, please
> point them out... (like
> > themeable mouse buttons), but taste is something very hard
> to discuss... So try to
> > theme it (or make it themeable).
> >
> > regards,
> >
> > Arjan
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Thursday, November 18, 1999 2:36 PM
> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Subject: [gtk-list] Re: Gtk look and feel
> > >
> > >
> > > > > Unix users expect that behaviour, because it's exactly
> > > what every other
> > > > > major toolkit does (Motif, OpenLook). It's just to be
> consistent.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Why? That's where Unices are definitely wrong.
> > >
> > > Why?
> > > When you bring up a popup menu
> > > it pops up to the right
> > > so the mouse point flips round so that it's not blocking any
> > > of the options
> > > I think it's a very good thing.
> > >
> > > iain
> > >
>
> --
> To unsubscribe: mail -s unsubscribe
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null
>
--
To unsubscribe: mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null
