Paul Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Actually, it's very common for integal return values to be left in a > register, not in memory. So returning a value would not cause memory > corruption. For example, on x86, gcc leaves the return value in the > EAX register. > Fair enough. Still, it seems like a Bad Idea (tm) to rely on this. ;-) Havoc -- To unsubscribe: mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null
- [gtk-list] Re: Apprarently simple signal/event question Peter Garner
- [gtk-list] Re: Apprarently simple signal/event quest... Havoc Pennington
- [gtk-list] Re: Apprarently simple signal/event q... Paul Carter
- [gtk-list] Re: Apprarently simple signal/eve... Havoc Pennington
- [gtk-list] Re: Apprarently simple signal... Joe Pfeiffer
- [gtk-list] Re: Apprarently simple signal... Lars Hallberg
- [gtk-list] Re: Apprarently simple signal/event q... RNG
- [gtk-list] Re: Apprarently simple signal/eve... Joe Pfeiffer
- [gtk-list] Re: Apprarently simple signal... M. David Krauss
- [gtk-list] Re: Apprarently simple signal/eve... Havoc Pennington
- [gtk-list] Re: Apprarently simple signal/event quest... Peter Wright
- [gtk-list] Re: Apprarently simple signal/event q... Havoc Pennington
- [gtk-list] Re: Apprarently simple signal/event quest... Peter Garner