> From what you say, I have the *very* strong feeling that you > didn't... if you had done so, you wouldn't think about distributing a > binary application "that links statically to GTK+". As that would > violate the GTK+ license terms (said GNU LGPL). As long as the source is available, he is not violating the GPL. You are allowed to statically link and distribute. IANAL, Matthew -- To unsubscribe: mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null
- [gtk-list] Versioning question Matthew D Allen
- [gtk-list] Re: Versioning question Havoc Pennington
- [gtk-list] Re: Versioning question Juergen A. Erhard
- [gtk-list] Re: Versioning question Matthew
- [gtk-list] Re: Versioning question Martin Norb�ck
- [gtk-list] Re: Versioning question Martin Norb�ck
