On Thu, 30 Mar 2000 20:19:42 +0200 (CEST), Konrad Podloucky wrote: > It's a compiler problem. gcc seems to f*** up with optimizations >>= 2. Pretty nasty, but I'll just have to recompile to fix this > problem. > Guess I'll have to write a report to the gcc guys. Depends on the compiler version. Please check if the latest and greatest gcc-2.95.2 shows the same bug before you report the problem. Otherwise that will be the first answer you'll get. Erik -- In theory, practice and theory are the same, but in practice they are different -- Larry McVoy -- To unsubscribe: mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null
- [gtk-list] GtkHPaned bug? (1.2.7) Konrad Podloucky
- [gtk-list] Re: GtkHPaned bug? (1.2.7) Owen Taylor
- [gtk-list] Re: GtkHPaned bug? (1.2.7) Konrad Podloucky
- [gtk-list] Re: GtkHPaned bug? (1.2.7) Owen Taylor
- [gtk-list] Re: GtkHPaned bug? (1.2.7) Konrad Podloucky
- [gtk-list] Re: GtkHPaned bug? (1.2.7) Konrad Podloucky
- [gtk-list] Re: GtkHPaned bug? (1.2.... Owen Taylor
- [gtk-list] Re: GtkHPaned bug? (... Konrad Podloucky
- [gtk-list] News from the trench... Konrad Podloucky
- [gtk-list] Re: News from th... Erik Mouw
- [gtk-list] Re: News from th... Konrad Podloucky
- [gtk-list] "ref" ... Derek Simkowiak
- [gtk-list] Re: News from th... Erik Mouw
