On Dec 22, 2007, at 1:25 PM, Torsten Schoenfeld wrote: > On Thu, 2007-12-20 at 01:33 -0500, muppet wrote: > >> I think the secondary "void value not ignored as it should be" >> warning >> was just fallout from the compiler being confused about the "void*" >> pointer dereference. (And, yes, i think we ought to change >> Glib::CodeGen to fix this upstream.) > > Like so? > <cast.patch>
Exactly like that. :-) Have you noticed any new compiler warnings with this? I don't expect any, but there's always a chance... -- Doing a good job around here is like wetting your pants in a dark suit; you get a warm feeling, but no one notices. -- unknown _______________________________________________ gtk-perl-list mailing list gtk-perl-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-perl-list
