Kevin Ryde wrote:
> Torsten Schoenfeld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> It's not obvious to me what the default for the target should be. You chose
>> the atom for GTK_TREE_MODEL_ROW -- why?
>
> With an eye on gtk_tree_set_row_drag_data() which looks like it refuses
> to act on a selection data of any other target value. Makes you wonder
> if it ought to allow NULL or NONE or whatever at least ... (a matter for
> gtk of course).
OK, when you add
new_selection_data.length = -1;
to the "else" branch, the patch looks good to me.
muppet?
--
Bye,
-Torsten
_______________________________________________
gtk-perl-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-perl-list
