> > By the way, with this prototype, the time for
> > 
> >    perl -MGtk3 -eexit
> > 
> > to complete is about 56ms on my machine, compared to 37ms for 
> > Gtk2*.  I 
> > think that's good enough for now, and we don't have to worry about 
> > introducing lazy-loading.

I wonder,  do the current maintainers feel brave enough to state these
findings on their README's and in their website?

I can't be happy with 56 ms - my timing is much more pessimistic :(

TIA! 

Vadim.

> 
> lazy-loading++
> it is generally better practice, and speed of loading is not 
> the only benefit that is gained.
> 
> Regards,
> Vadim.
_______________________________________________
gtk-perl-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-perl-list

Reply via email to