Sorry for the late reply.  I overlooked this part of your message:

On 03.01.2014 16:35, Christian Jaeger wrote:
> Perhaps it would be useful to point at some commit/patch(es) that are
> representing such work (it would be interesting for me to see what kind
> of Perlishness you're talking about and how it's implemented, and would
> show what kind of stuff to look out for.)

Here are some examples of commits that add the kinds of overrides I was
talking about:

https://git.gnome.org/browse/perl-Gtk3/commit/?id=ba262e6741afbfb6eb141d2afdd8b34d2253d535
https://git.gnome.org/browse/perl-Gtk3/commit/?id=a47595b7404cb9c6cab435c4fdbf700a54cb537a
https://git.gnome.org/browse/perl-Gtk3/commit/?id=3ba5f0243e0485b034b186e69f9c6ea0d4f45997
https://git.gnome.org/browse/perl-Gtk3/commit/?id=fb09b3a06afd9f922d8153d0b8a672e3aac110e6

To declare the bindings stable, we'd need to go through at least the
main widgets of gtk+ and make sure no further overrides of this kind are
needed.
_______________________________________________
gtk-perl-list mailing list
gtk-perl-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-perl-list

Reply via email to