Is something new about TreeView databinding? If so, where can I find
more about it?
Thank you Ales
Todd Berman wrote:
On Sat, 2005-05-28 at 05:07 -0700, Chas wrote:
The question of which data-binding way to go is still
viable however, whether the TreeModel itself would be
100% managed or not. If you have any additional input
on that, I'd be happy to hear. (As you said, both ways
are suboptimal, so I'm afraid maybe both ways would
have to supported to allow for different scenarios
with different requirements.)
Anyway, thanks for your response - I'll reconsider;
indeed, maybe waiting with this till it's possible to
do it in 100% managed code would be a smarter move.
Oh, thats the best part of writing a managed TreeModel implementation.
gtk+ would ask your TreeModel for the data, so you wouldn't have to do
much else to get it to work. In fact, Vlad has written a DataTableModel
that is all managed code that works using DataSet not ITypedList, if you
look at the archives to this list, I am sure you can find it.
--Todd
_______________________________________________
Gtk-sharp-list maillist - [email protected]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/gtk-sharp-list
_______________________________________________
Gtk-sharp-list maillist - [email protected]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/gtk-sharp-list
