On Tue, 2007-02-27 at 16:51 -0600, Mike Kestner wrote: > On Tue, 2007-02-27 at 15:20 -0600, Cody Russell wrote: > > > I'm also from Medsphere, and I just want to point out that this is > > actually gtk# 2.8, but it's GTK+ 2.10.7 underneath that. There seems to > > be a bug currently in gtk# 2.10 that is preventing us from using it: > > http://bugzilla.ximian.com/show_bug.cgi?id=79993 > > Wow, that's news to me. I thought the problem as described in the bug > was with using Gtk+ 2.10. That's bizarre that Gtk# 2.10 would be > causing problems with existing code, as it was just a parse/generate of > the new APIs.
Sorry, this is my fault for not mentioning anything to you directly.. I just posted the last comment on that Bugzilla report a couple weeks ago. So, we thought the issue had something to do with my GTK+ build process because using my 2.10 builds with any version of gtk# was causing weird issues, but using Ivan Wong's builds seemed to work fine. It turns out, Ivan's builds work fine with gtk# 2.8 but not with gtk# 2.10. So we have been unable to run OpenVista (or any gtk# app that uses tree views) with any build of GTK+ when using gtk# 2.10. _______________________________________________ Gtk-sharp-list maillist - [email protected] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/gtk-sharp-list
